This online community was active in conjunction with the Digital Agenda Assembly 2012 and is now archived and available for institutional memory. You can now join the discussion at https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/community
The public sector is bubbling with social media initiatives, such as civil servant 2.0. Do these create new jobs? Or are they really there to 'make government better'? Or is that the same in this case? Examples welcome!
There are many individual stories of job creation and better services based on open data and collaborative innovation.
One aspect is Public Sector Information: for instance in NL, the decrease in prices of Weather information has led to the creation of 100 FTE in the private sector (weather information industry), and the reduction of 20 FTE in the public sector.
When it comes to social media and collaborative innovation, the key outcome is improvement of quality of services, rather than cost reduction. The Finnish National Library digitized its catalogue of ancient magazines through an online game where 8.000 citizens participated for free.
Governments should invest in collaborative innovation. In the governments of UK and USA they are creating centres of excellence on collaborative innovation exclusively dedicated to create internal competences able to manage collaborative innovation.
In summary: collaborative public services get better the more people use them.http://egov20.wordpress.com/2011/11/03/collaborative-e-government-public...
I enjoy reading article. Hope i can find more articles like this one. Informative post, I try to follow your tips. Thanks for posting
The change that society is undergoing is not so much about social media as it is about working through platforms and new ways of organising and collaborating. By organising online we create the possibility for people to work together, perform tasks, and distribute workload regardless of distance and boundaries.
This means that a lot of government tasks can be performed (completely or in part) by citizens or companies. That way government can become smaller and hopefully more agile while at the same time stimulating groups, organisations, and companies to come up with innovative solutions to improve services.
The second way to stimulate jobs is by creating platforms to build upon. Providing open data / PSI is one way, but countless other activities can benefit from online platforms, e.g. government services, market places, administrative tools, etc. These can bind Europe closer together.
Government could invest in an infrastructure (platform, app store, market place) where (personal) data can be safely stored and equal rules are guaranteed (for commerce and financial transactions, but also open standards). Companies can then invent new services based on this infrastructure and these data.
Social media has to move from just being a social 'chatting' platform to being the way we communicate and collaborate: in business, in politics, in administration, in everything. Remember: speech is also a social medium ... but first we had to decide on the language we were going to use.
The usage of socialmedia has many advandtages within public services. A stronger relationship with the citizen and the decrease in the services cost through the collaboratuion with the communities are only a couple of them. However, it looks like that those sectors who apparently could obtain more benefits are lagging behind. At least this is the conclusion for the health sector in US in this interesting report
Something to happen there! You may wish to read last week's report from the eHealth Taskforce, if followed it will be quite a change for the sector, see http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/12/453&format...
Disempowerment destroy value creation and I have yet to see an implementation of a social network that did not disempower citizens involved in favor of some commercial or bureaucratic interest.
The "free" model based on abuse of persondal data and control of market processes is the main market problem - not a solution to further push.
When that is said - we can make peer-to-peer based social networks that work - it start with the simple understanding that you should NOT/NEVER identify the person involved as that shifts the power from people to system.
It may also be that a new domain is opened up (eg in terms of social contact) which empowers users but also empowers the social media provider. Boats rising on the tide.
I think whats interesting (from an outsider(of govt) point of view) are social media projects like KindredHQ https://www.facebook.com/kindredhq which is from people leaving civil service for a life of consultancy, but the thing they know is that social media is the tool that they couldn't use within govt, but which they knew was perfect outside of it!
Thanks for the link to KindredHQ. Wonder how sustainable it is (in terms of helping for those jobs). See also the McKinsey report on Social Media. Seems to show that involvement in social media (for companies) reques continued attention and investment otherwise companies slide back in internal or external connectedness.